According to the Evidence Act 1977, what is required for evidence to be admissible?

For evidence to be admissible under the Evidence Act 1977, it is essential that the evidence is relevant to the case at hand and not excluded by any legal provisions. Relevance means that the evidence must have a logical connection to the facts of the issue being adjudicated, helping to establish a fact that affects the case's outcome.

In addition to being relevant, any evidence presented must not fall within any categories of exclusion, which can include rules related to hearsay, privilege, or other statutory restrictions. If evidence meets these criteria, it can be considered for presentation in court.

The other choices do not accurately reflect the requirements for admissibility. Evidence does not need to be presented in writing, as oral testimony can also be admissible. Additionally, the requirement for evidence to be favorable to one party (such as the defendant) is not a standard for admissibility; rather, all relevant evidence must be considered without bias in favor of either side. Furthermore, while evidence collected by law enforcement may often be considered, the methods of gathering it do not determine its admissibility unless those methods violate specific legal standards or rights.