What is a key requirement for the admissibility of evidence in freezing order applications?

In freezing order applications, a key requirement for the admissibility of evidence is that it must be admissible in its current form at trial. This means that the evidence presented in support of the application must not only be relevant but must also meet the standards for admissibility that will apply in the trial itself. The courts want to ensure that the evidence is reliable and will hold up under scrutiny should the case move forward and require a full hearing.

This requirement ensures that both parties have an opportunity to prepare adequately for trial based on the evidence presented at the application stage. It also maintains the integrity of the judicial process by preventing reliance on evidence that may later be deemed inadmissible due to various reasons such as lack of proper foundation, hearsay, or any other issues that could arise.

The other options do not capture this critical aspect of admissibility in the context of freezing orders. For example, while expert witnesses may play an important role in certain cases, their use is not a blanket requirement for freezing orders. Similarly, the availability of evidence to the public does not inherently affect its admissibility, nor does the format of its storage dictate whether it can be used in court. Therefore, focusing on the necessity for the evidence to be admissible as it stands