What is a primary factor for considering leave to continue after a delay in civil proceedings?

In the context of civil proceedings, a primary factor for considering leave to continue after a delay is indeed the time elapsed since the events described in the statement of claim. This factor is critical as it directly impacts the ability of all parties involved to prepare and present their cases effectively. If significant time has passed, witnesses may become unavailable, memories may fade, and evidence may be lost, making it more challenging to ensure a fair trial. The court tends to assess the elapsed time to determine whether the circumstances of the case allow for a just resolution despite the delay.

The other factors mentioned may contribute to the overall circumstances of the case, but they are not as central to the decision-making regarding delays. The representation status of the defendant, the type of claim, or the defendant's financial background might affect case management in various ways, but the core issue when seeking leave after a delay revolves primarily around the time that has passed since the events that are the basis of the claim.