What is required for a court to grant a freezing order according to the case Vaughan v Bonjiorno?

Study for the Queensland Bar Exam. Prepare with flashcards and multiple-choice questions, each featuring hints and detailed explanations. Get ready for success!

In the case of Vaughan v Bonjiorno, the court established that to obtain a freezing order, the applicant must demonstrate a prima facie case. A prima facie case refers to the evidence that, unless disproved, is sufficient to establish a particular fact or the validity of the claim being made. It serves as a foundational requirement that assures the court there is a legitimate basis for considering that the applicant is likely to succeed on the merits of the case.

This requirement for a prima facie case is critical because freezing orders are extraordinary remedies that can interfere with individuals’ rights to use their property. The court must be satisfied that there is a credible claim, thus preventing potentially unwarranted restrictions on a respondent's assets.

While a signed affidavit may be used in support of the application for a freezing order, it is not the sole requirement for granting such an order—the underlying substantive case must also be established. Similarly, a comprehensive case study is not a standard requirement in this context, and approval from the Attorney General is not needed for private parties in seeking freezing orders in civil cases.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy