What is the consequence of not complying with the disclosure requirements?

Not complying with disclosure requirements can have significant ramifications in legal proceedings. The correct consequence, which indicates that the evidence cannot be adduced, reflects the importance of full and honest disclosure in the administration of justice. Courts rely on the principle that all relevant evidence must be properly disclosed in order to ensure a fair trial. When a party fails to meet these requirements, the court may determine that the undisclosed evidence is inadmissible, thereby preventing the party from relying on it in their case.

This consequence serves not only to uphold the integrity of the legal process but also to deter parties from withholding evidence. If evidence is withheld, it can compromise the fairness of proceedings since one side may be operating without all necessary information. This response maintains the balance of justice by ensuring that litigation remains transparent and equitable.

The other options represent outcomes that are either too lenient or misaligned with the actual judicial process in response to non-compliance with disclosure requirements. Thus, the emphasis is placed on the critical nature of compliance with disclosure obligations and the irrevocable impact that non-compliance can have on the admissibility of evidence in court.