Which type of application involves requirements for further and better particulars of a pleading?

The correct choice relates to interlocutory applications, which are typically made during the course of litigation to request temporary or preliminary relief and to address matters that arise before the trial. One of the common purposes of an interlocutory application is to clarify or refine pleadings by obtaining further and better particulars. This helps ensure that all parties fully understand the claims and defenses being presented, thereby allowing for a fair trial.

Interlocutory applications can involve requests for more detailed information that supports the claims made in pleadings, which is essential for preparing an effective case. The requirement for further particulars stems from the principles of procedural fairness and clarity in legal pleadings, ensuring that all parties have adequate notice of the case they must meet.

In contrast, ex parte applications typically involve one party applying to the court without notifying the other side, often in urgent situations, but do not necessarily focus on clarifying the particulars of pleadings. Default applications address situations where a defendant has failed to respond to a claim, which may not involve the refinement of pleadings. Summary applications, on the other hand, seek a judgment without a full trial based on the evidence presented and often do not delve into the similar requests for particulars that would be handled in an interlocutory context